<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Comparison of Open Source Load Testing Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/load-testing-tool-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/load-testing-tool-comparison/</link>
	<description>Expert consulting services with HP Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:08:25 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Decent</title>
		<link>http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/load-testing-tool-comparison/#comment-13012</link>
		<dc:creator>Decent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jds.net.au/?p=2276#comment-13012</guid>
		<description>great work. but i think you should compare these at same page. there should be separate page for each comparison. referring is not good job to understand it better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great work. but i think you should compare these at same page. there should be separate page for each comparison. referring is not good job to understand it better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Iakobashvili</title>
		<link>http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/load-testing-tool-comparison/#comment-9374</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Iakobashvili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jds.net.au/?p=2276#comment-9374</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I think, that you are very incorrect, referring to curl-loader as to a &quot;dumb&quot; tool. 

People are loading by very very complex scenario, including dynamic URLs, URLs based on responses, various authentications, etc

You can get more info from the tool README and also (less updated) FAQ page:

http://curl-loader.sourceforge.net/doc/faq.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I think, that you are very incorrect, referring to curl-loader as to a &#8220;dumb&#8221; tool. </p>
<p>People are loading by very very complex scenario, including dynamic URLs, URLs based on responses, various authentications, etc</p>
<p>You can get more info from the tool README and also (less updated) FAQ page:</p>
<p><a href="http://curl-loader.sourceforge.net/doc/faq.html" rel="nofollow">http://curl-loader.sourceforge.net/doc/faq.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Moncrieff</title>
		<link>http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/load-testing-tool-comparison/#comment-9292</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Moncrieff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jds.net.au/?p=2276#comment-9292</guid>
		<description>Antony Marcano, who runs Testing Reflections (which aggregates various testing blogs), wrote &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OpenSTA, the free performance testing tool, versus the big-guns...&lt;/a&gt; in 2004, which is still an interesting read.

Also, check out this large list of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensourcetesting.org/performance.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Open Source Performance Testing Tools&lt;/a&gt; (most of which are useless).

This Linux.com article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/143896&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Using free software for HTTP load testing&lt;/a&gt; covers some of the &quot;dumb&quot; load testing tools - curl-loader, httperf (released free by HP labs), Siege, and Tsung (formerly known as IDX-Tsunami).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antony Marcano, who runs Testing Reflections (which aggregates various testing blogs), wrote <a href="" rel="nofollow">OpenSTA, the free performance testing tool, versus the big-guns&#8230;</a> in 2004, which is still an interesting read.</p>
<p>Also, check out this large list of <a href="http://www.opensourcetesting.org/performance.php" rel="nofollow">Open Source Performance Testing Tools</a> (most of which are useless).</p>
<p>This Linux.com article on <a href="http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/143896" rel="nofollow">Using free software for HTTP load testing</a> covers some of the &#8220;dumb&#8221; load testing tools &#8211; curl-loader, httperf (released free by HP labs), Siege, and Tsung (formerly known as IDX-Tsunami).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
