Comments on: Parameterising Unix/Posix timestamps in VuGen http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/parameterising-time-stamps/ Expert consulting services with HP Software Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:24:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Daniel http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/parameterising-time-stamps/#comment-27671 Daniel Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:30:03 +0000 http://www.jds.net.au/?p=762#comment-27671 Concise and exactly what I needed. Thanks Concise and exactly what I needed. Thanks

]]> By: Ajay D http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/parameterising-time-stamps/#comment-17247 Ajay D Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:45:19 +0000 http://www.jds.net.au/?p=762#comment-17247 Good article Stuart! I found a EPOCH time conversion routine in 'C' which has proven successful many a times. But I will try this solution sometime too... Good article Stuart! I found a EPOCH time conversion routine in ‘C’ which has proven successful many a times. But I will try this solution sometime too…

]]> By: Anustup Ray http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/parameterising-time-stamps/#comment-14463 Anustup Ray Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:10:50 +0000 http://www.jds.net.au/?p=762#comment-14463 Hello, I am facing a correlation problem. The problem is the dymanic value needed to correlation occurs at the first letters of the html returned by the server. The problem is that there is no LB because the HTML starts with the dymanic value. I tried to leave the LB blank but then the parameter is not capturing anything. Any ideas about this? Regards, Ray Hello,

I am facing a correlation problem. The problem is the dymanic value needed to correlation occurs at the first letters of the html returned by the server. The problem is that there is no LB because the HTML starts with the dymanic value. I tried to leave the LB blank but then the parameter is not capturing anything. Any ideas about this?

Regards,
Ray

]]> By: Stuart Moncrieff http://www.jds.net.au/tech-tips/parameterising-time-stamps/#comment-1245 Stuart Moncrieff Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:24:41 +0000 http://www.jds.net.au/?p=762#comment-1245 Interesting piece of trivia... On Friday the 13th, 2009 at 11:31:30pm UTC UNIX time will reach 1,234,567,890. ...and just after 03:14:07 UTC on Tuesday, 19 January 2038, the 32-bit integer that stores the timestamp will roll over to -2147483648. This is known as the "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem" rel="nofollow">Unix Millennium bug</a>". Interesting piece of trivia…

On Friday the 13th, 2009 at 11:31:30pm UTC UNIX time will reach 1,234,567,890.

…and just after 03:14:07 UTC on Tuesday, 19 January 2038, the 32-bit integer that stores the timestamp will roll over to -2147483648. This is known as the “Unix Millennium bug“.

]]>